No more Excuses: New Research on Assessing Students with Disabilities

No more Excuses: New Research on Assessing Students with Disabilities

Authors

  • University of Massachusetts Amherst

Abstract

The articles in this special issue of the Journal of Applied Testing Technology represent significant steps forward in the area of evaluating the validity of methods for assessing the educational achievement of students with disabilities. The studies address some of the most difficult student groups to assess-students with learning disabilities, students with severe cognitive disabilities, deaf/hearing impaired students, students with disabilities who are also English Language Learners, and students who are likely to be inaccurately measured on statewide reading tests. The authors use a variety of research designs and statistical methods to provide evidence for evaluating the validity of assessments of these students. This article highlights the novel contributions of these studies and raises questions for readers to consider as they read each study.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Downloads

Published

2014-04-09

How to Cite

Sireci, S. G. (2014). No more Excuses: New Research on Assessing Students with Disabilities. Journal of Applied Testing Technology, 10(2), 1–18. Retrieved from http://www.jattjournal.net/index.php/atp/article/view/48352

Issue

Section

Articles

References

Abedi, J. (2009 this issue). English language learners with disabilities: classification, assessment, and accommodation issues. Journal of Applied Testing Technology.

American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National

Council on Measurement in Education (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

Cattell, R. B. (1956). Validation and intensification of the Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 12, 205-214.

Cattell, R. B., & Burdsal, C. A. (1975). The radial parcel double factoring design: A solution to the item-vs.-parcel controversy. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 10, 165-179.

Cook, L., Eignor, D., Steinberg, J., Sawaki, Y., & Cline, F. (2009, this issue). Using factor analysis to investigate the impact of accommodations on the scores of students with disabilities on a reading comprehension assessment. Journal of Applied Testing Technology.

Engelhard, G., Fincher, M., & Domaleski, D.S. (in press). Mathematics Performance of Students with and without Disabilities under Accommodated Conditions using Resource Guides and Calculators on High-Stakes Tests. Applied Measurement in Education.

Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (2001). Helping teachers formulate sound test accommodation decisions for students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 16, 174–181.

Holland, P.W., & Wainer, H. (Eds.). (1993). Differential item functioning. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Kane, M.T. (1992). An argument-based approach to validity. Psychological Bulletin, 112,527-535.

Kane, M. (2006). Validation. In R. L. Brennan (Ed). Educational measurement (4th edition).Washington, DC: American Council on Education/Praeger.

Laitusis, C. C., Maneckshana, B., Monfils, L., & Ahlgrim-Delzell, L. (2009, this issue). Differential item functioning comparisons on a performance-based alternate assessment for students with severe cognitive impairments, autism and orthopedic impairments. Journal of Applied Testing Technology.

Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement, (3rd ed., pp. 13-100). Washington, D.C.: American Council on Education.

Moen, R., Liu, K., Thurlow, M., Lekwa, A., Scullin, S., & Hausmann, K. (2009, this issue). Identifying less accurately measured students. Journal of Applied Testing Technology.

Sireci, S. G. (2005). Unlabeling the disabled: A perspective on flagging scores from accommodated test administrations. Educational Researcher, 34(1), 3-12.

Sireci, S. G., Scarpati, S., & Li, S. (2005). Test accommodations for students with disabilities: An analysis of the interaction hypothesis. Review of Educational Research, 75, 457-490.

Steinberg, J., Cline, F., Ling, G., Cook, L., & Tognatta, N. (2009, this issue). Examining the validity and fairness of a state standards-based assessment of English-language arts for deaf and hard of hearing students. Journal of Applied Testing Technology.

Steinberg, J., Cline, F., & Sawaki, Y. (2008, March). Examining the internal validity of a state standards-based assessment of science. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.

Stone, E., Cook, L., Laitusis, C. C., & Cline, F. (in press). Using differential item functioning to investigate the impact of testing accommodations on an English language arts assessment for students who are blind or visually impaired. Applied Measurement in Education.

Zenisky, A. L., & Sireci, S. G. (2007). A summary of the research on the effects of test accommodations: 2005-2006 (Technical Report 47). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes. Available at http://cehd.umn.edu/nceo/OnlinePubs/Tech47/default.html.

Loading...